• Joshua Duvall

Two Recent GAO Bid Protest Decisions Highlight an Important Aspect of Agency Evaluations

Two recent GAO bid protest decisions (both sustained) highlight an important aspect of agency evaluations.

That is, agencies must look beyond mere adjectival ratings, and instead turn to the underlying merits behind those ratings, when making an award decision. GAO's rule statement in both decisions (linked below) is nearly identical and can be summed up as follows:

  • evaluation ratings are guides to intelligent decision making

  • evaluation of proposals requires a qualitative assessment of proposals against the evaluation scheme

  • adjectival ratings (number of strengths) are not dispositive metrics to express a proposal's merit

  • selection official must look beyond adjectival ratings to explain technically equivalent proposals


Successful protest grounds are typically rooted in procedural flaws in the evaluation/decision. Because agencies are required to adequately explain/document their decision, GAO may sustain a protest where the agency fails to look beyond adjectival ratings when making an award decision.

Apogee: https://lnkd.in/d5A544H

Cyberdata: https://lnkd.in/dCDN7rM

. . .

#GovCon #BidProtest #Matross

Recent Posts

See All

New FAR Rule Limits Use of LPTA Source Selection

Last month, the Department of Defense ("DoD"), General Services Administration ("GSA"), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA") issued a final rule to implement a portion of the 201

SBA Nixes the 3 From its 3-in-2 Rule for Joint Ventures

In October, the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") published a wide-ranging final rule, Consolidation of Mentor-Protégé Programs and Other Government Contracting Amendments, that included a nu


Trusted Relationship.

Trusted Resource.

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • gcj_box
  • cj_box

Washington, DC


© 2020 Matross Edwards LLC. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.

Matross Edwards - Logo.png